The Bureau of Transportation Statistics added 2025 observations to its experimental county-to-county truck travel-time database on October 16. That gives carriers another year of historical evidence for reviewing lanes across the country. The useful commercial question is how much of an equipment cycle the published clock actually measures before a planner uses it to challenge a price or delivery commitment.
The expansion brings the series to eight years, covering 2018 through 2025. BTS publishes the median and the 25th and 75th percentile travel times for county pairs represented in its truck sample, alongside grouped observation counts. These are distributions of observed movements, rather than a promise about the next load. The difference between the median and upper quartile can prompt a reliability review; it does not identify the cause of slower movements.
The measurement starts with the truck’s last GPS observation in the origin county and ends with its first observation in the destination county. The methodology includes stopped and moving time between those points. It leaves out travel before departure from the origin county and after entry into the destination county. Consequently, the result cannot by itself represent a complete pickup-to-delivery schedule, even when the two customer addresses lie in the selected counties.
Neighboring counties expose that boundary problem especially clearly. The methodological report explains that a crossing can produce a travel time of about one minute because the observations sit on opposite sides of a county line. That does not mean a truck can serve any pair of addresses in those counties in a minute. The same report treats movements as directional: an outbound county pair and its return are separate observations.
Primary industry sponsorSee the load, the paperwork, the driver workflow, and the money in one carrier-focused system.
Explore Pro FleetSync - TMS
The sample also needs a commercial fit check. BTS says long-distance fleet trucks are overrepresented and short-distance drayage trucks are underrepresented. It excludes pairs with fewer than 100 observed movements and groups counts to protect confidentiality. A missing pair therefore does not establish that no freight moved there. Nor does a published count measure all loads in that market.
FreightNews’s planning inference is to separate three clocks before using these figures in a bid review: the county-boundary interval, the approach from the shipper to that boundary, and the final approach from the destination boundary to the receiver. Compare equivalent fleet records with the published interval, then examine customer-specific time separately. If the comparison instead mixes a complete fleet trip with a boundary-only statistic, the apparent performance gap can be a measurement mismatch.
For pricing, ask whether an unexpected time spread changes the number of paid movements a tractor can complete within the customer’s appointment pattern. Review actual fleet cycles and the cost of missed reloads before changing a rate. Those are carrier decisions, not outcomes measured by BTS. Keep the observation year, direction and sample limits beside any quoted benchmark, and use current route and appointment information for the load being dispatched.